[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:33:43 +0200 |
> From: Artur Malabarba <address@hidden>
> Cc: John Wiegley <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:27:08 +0000
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > My greatest fears are that packages that move from core to ELPA will
> > get much less attention from the core maintenance team, which will
> > eventually degrade their quality.
>
> We could bring the Elpa and Emacs repositories closer together somehow.
> Maybe as a submodule or something like that.
How about just using a single repository? ;-)
Seriously, why should they be separate? Submodules still complicate
things, compared to just having the stuff in the repo.
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/05
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/06
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Wolfgang Jenkner, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Yuri Khan, 2015/11/08
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/08