[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Move to a cadence release model?
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: Move to a cadence release model? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:03:40 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> We could avoid the feature freeze altogether, if we wanted, and instead cut
> the release branch and work on the release there without freezing master.
That would be my preference. Let's cut release-25.1 this upcoming Friday night
at the freeze date.
It does mean a commitment by developers to use and test with this branch until
the release is out. But it allows development on 'master' to continue without
any artificial pause, or forcing everything that could have gone onto master
into feature branches.
John
- Move to a cadence release model?, John Yates, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: Move to a cadence release model?,
John Wiegley <=
- Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), John Wiegley, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/10
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: Release process (was Re: Move to a cadence release model?), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- bug policy (was Re: Release process), Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/12
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/12
- Re: bug policy (was Re: Release process), John Wiegley, 2015/11/12