Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs

[Artur Malabarba]

On 10 Nov 2015 8:39 pm, "Przemysław Wojnowski" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
> > I like it. I'm not a big fan of the name "obarray-foreach", since we're just
> > choosing a different name for "map", without much existing precedent for doing
> > so. I'd prefer "obarray-map".
> I was thinking about "map" suffix, but decided not to used it, because
> "map" functions return something meaningful and this one only nil. :-|

Then call it mapc. ;-)