[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 23:01:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) |
Przemysław Wojnowski <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks for the feedback!
You're welcome!
> +(defun obarray-p (object)
Could be `obarrayp', since it's one word, like `listp'.
Note to myself: In the future, I would really like map.el to be
extensible the way seq.el is. This way, obarray.el could implement the
`map' protocol, and reuse all the functions defined in map.
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, (continued)
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/11
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/11
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, Nicolas Petton, 2015/11/19
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, John Wiegley, 2015/11/19
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/19
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/11/20
- Re: Separating obarray handling from abbrevs,
Nicolas Petton <=