[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
John Wiegley |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:24:20 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> If a package is useful to recommend, and we CAN get papers for it, we
> definitely want to move it to GNU ELPA.
Yes, this is why I want to clearly define ELPA policy, and streamline things
as much as possible for developers and users: so that it becomes a more
attractive means for distributing Emacs packages. I think many people may be
largely ignoring it right now, and so they reach for MELPA. Since so many
people contribute to MELPA, they consider it a more attractive distribution
platform.
John
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Filipp Gunbin, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Phillip Lord, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, JJ Asghar, 2015/11/13
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11