[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:16:44 +0200 |
> From: John Wiegley <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 13:00:44 -0800
>
> >>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > To me, nothing about electric-indent-mode is reasonable. I don't mind
> > swapping C-m and C-j, if that's what will keep me sane. If
> > electric-indent-mode did just that, perhaps I'd be fine with it.
>
> Out of interest, who has a passionate feeling that it should be the default?
Sorry, I happily forgot.
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Paul Eggert, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/11
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Röhler, 2015/11/12