[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ELPA policy
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
Subject: |
Re: ELPA policy |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:49:01 +0000 |
On 12 Nov 2015 10:34 pm, "Richard Stallman" <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Richard, do think such as system would be viable copyright-wise?
>
> In terms of copyright, there is no difference between the system I
> proposed (installing what Drew puts in certain web pages) and the
> method Drew doesn't like, which is for him to install the same changes
> via Git.
>
> Whichever method he uses, he technically could install code written by
> others whom we don't have papers for. If we permit him to use Git to
> install changes, that entails trusting him to handle this
> responsibility. If we can trust him to do it with one method, we can
> trust him to do it with the other method.
I'm trying to determine whether this method can be employed as a general elpa mechanism. Of course we trust Drew, but would it be acceptable to use such a script with other people who submit packages to Elpa? (assuming the author has assigned copyright)
- Re: ELPA policy, (continued)
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/11
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/11/11
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: ELPA policy, Stephen Leake, 2015/11/12
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Alex Schröder, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/12
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/12
- Re: ELPA policy, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/13
- RE: ELPA policy, Drew Adams, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/13
- Re: ELPA policy, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/11/16