Re: Suggest: dont declare interactive-p obsolete

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 11/19/2015 03:06 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

> Instead of using this function, it is cleaner and more reliable to give
> your
> function an extra optional argument whose `interactive' spec specifies
> non-nil unconditionally (\"p\" is a good way to do this), or via
> \(not (or executing-kbd-macro noninteractive)).

You're just saying that neither the old, nor the new function should be 
used in most of the Lisp code. That may be true, but that doesn't say 
anything about whether the old name should be un-obsoleted.