[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:34:50 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Artur Malabarba <address@hidden> writes:
>2015-11-18 20:32 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel <address@hidden>:
>> Thanks for letting us know, Artur.
>>
>> If you're swamped, I'm happy to do the reversion (pretty easy for
>> me, since I've been following the changes & the thread in detail),
>> but I won't unless you say so.
>
>Yes, you have my "OK" to revert this change completely. TBH, this
>doesn't really affect me :-). Normally I just use
>aggressive-indent-mode for all my indentation needs. I only realised I
>wanted to change C-o while doing some edits from emacs -Q.
>
>However, if you do revert, it would be nice if you kept the tests I
>added (some of them will need to be fixed, of course).
Done, in commit c593538968a on the 'emacs-25' branch.
(I think I don't need to do anything special to port this over to
'master', right? It'll just happen automagically at some point?)
Best regards,
-Karl
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., (continued)
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/15
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/16
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/16
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/16
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Richard Stallman, 2015/11/17
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/17
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Andreas Röhler, 2015/11/18
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/17
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/18
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/18
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'.,
Karl Fogel <=
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/19
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Karl Fogel, 2015/11/16
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., David Kastrup, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Artur Malabarba, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Rasmus, 2015/11/12
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., John Wiegley, 2015/11/11
- Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'., Alan Mackenzie, 2015/11/11