[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 28 Nov 2015 12:30:20 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) |
>>>>> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I was unhappy when M-c was given a special search meaning, for precisely
> this reason. I've actually been tripped up by M-c and with M-e, though not
> very often.
I would also prefer it if M-c and M-e were capable of exiting isearch, since
that is consistent with other forms of use.
John
- Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Drew Adams, 2015/11/26
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Juri Linkov, 2015/11/26
- RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Drew Adams, 2015/11/26
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/27
- RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Drew Adams, 2015/11/27
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/27
- RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Drew Adams, 2015/11/27
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Juri Linkov, 2015/11/27
- RE: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Drew Adams, 2015/11/27
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?, Richard Stallman, 2015/11/28
- Re: Why change the advertised bindings of Isearch commands?,
John Wiegley <=