[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lisp watchpoints
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Lisp watchpoints |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:37:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> It would signal in case of error right? Currently the code is ignoring
> bad watcher elements (including out of range integers), but perhaps
> it's actually better to signal an error.
It's marginally better to signal an error, I think. But the difference
is not tremendously important.
Stefan
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, (continued)
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/22
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/22
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/28
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/28
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/30
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Andreas Schwab, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Stefan Monnier, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Noam Postavsky, 2015/11/29
- Re: Lisp watchpoints, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/11/29