[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reporting Lisp errors in dynamic modules
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reporting Lisp errors in dynamic modules |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Dec 2015 00:00:56 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> A cleaner approach would be to define module functions as separate kind of
> function object. I think right now we have lists (Lisp closures and
> lambdas), subrs, and bytecode objects, module functions could be a fourth
> type. But that would require more thorough changes.
WIBNI we could define them as Lisp_Subr?
Stefan
- Re: Reporting Lisp errors in dynamic modules,
Stefan Monnier <=