[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior
|
From: |
Artur Malabarba |
|
Subject: |
Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior |
|
Date: |
Fri, 4 Dec 2015 22:37:59 +0000 |
2015-12-04 22:16 GMT+00:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> AFAICT, "character folding" is as good as we've come up
>> with, so far - not some specific kind of character folding.
>
> How about "fuzzy matching"?
That means something else to most people: to be able to skip some
characters and still match.
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, (continued)
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Per Starbäck, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, John Wiegley, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/05
- RE: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Drew Adams, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/04
- RE: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Drew Adams, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, David Kastrup, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior,
Artur Malabarba <=
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, David Kastrup, 2015/12/04
- RE: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Drew Adams, 2015/12/04
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/05
- RE: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Drew Adams, 2015/12/05
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/12/05
- RE: lax matching is not a great default behavior, Drew Adams, 2015/12/05
- Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior, John Wiegley, 2015/12/05