Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/follow e8937de: Replace GROUP argument in six window primitives by new functions.

[Juri Linkov]

> I think it would have to be `recenter-window-group', but is
> `recenter-group' really that ambiguous?  People have no problem with
> `recenter', which, if anything, is even more ambiguous.

I don't know why `recenter' is not `recenter-window'
like other existing functions e.g. `reposition-window'.
Maybe for historical reasons.  But `recenter-group'
will add more ambiguity: recenter what? what group?

> So, I think it would be possible to move some of the code from follow.el
> to window.el, but the interface between them would necessarily be
> thicker than just `follow-all-followers'.  It would have to include the
> "cache-invalid" flag (probably encapsulated in a function call), and the
> `follow-redisplay' function.  I'm not convinced that there would be any
> great gain in abstraction.

This abstraction is not needed as long as window groups are used
only in one package follow.el.