Re: Dynamic modules: MODULE_HANDLE_SIGNALS etc.

[Paul Eggert]

Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Most programs you use don't bother trying to detect or recover from sack
> overflow. Why should they? C stack overflow is a programming error.

Emacs is different because it's programmable, and it must respond robustly to 
programming errors.

> The current stack overflow scheme can't recover reliably
> because it doesn't fix maintain invariants.

It works well enough now for people to get work done. Introducing modules should 
not break this.