Re: [ELPA] programmer-dvorak input method

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Joakim Jalap <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:31:57 +0100
> 
> John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>> >  . I rather think that input methods should all be bundled: they are
> >>> >    too small to justify a separate package, and too basic to ask users
> >>> >    to download them when they need them.
> >>> 
> >>> I'm not against that, provided they need little maintenance after having 
> >>> been
> >>> added. Does this mean created an "extra-inputs" project on ELPA, into 
> >>> which
> >>> all these additions get added?
> >
> >> If that question was for me, I'm not sure I understand it.
> >
> > It was for you. So I'll just ask back: What were you suggesting the answer 
> > be
> > to your point above?
> 
> If I may be so bold as to speak for Eli, what I _think_ he meant was
> that input methods should be bundled with "core" Emacs, and not reside
> in ELPA

Yes, that's what I meant.  Sorry for my ambiguous wording.