Re: tags-loop-continue

[Stefan Monnier]

> Unfortunately, I think it makes much more sense to bind
> tags-loop-continue back to 'M-,', and bind xref-pop-marker-stack to
> 'M-*', the old binding of pop-tag-mark, which xref-pop-marker-stack
> replaces.  When tags-loop-continue is no longer needed, we could use
> its binding for xref-pop-marker-stack, but until then we cannot use
> its key for an entirely different command, I think.

Would it be possible to bind M-, to a new command which dispatches
either to tags-loop-continue or to xref-pop-marker-stack?
IOW is there some way to guess reliably which one makes sense?


        Stefan "not familiar with these uses of tags-loop-continue"