Re: Removal of unexec support from glibc malloc

[Zack Weinberg]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> As long as the ABI support is there, we can keep using the "separate
> malloc implementation" even if glibc doesn't cooperate by providing
> convenient headers to access it.

Clarification: it will not be possible to link new executables against
the symbols in question. (This is what a "compat symbol" in glibc is -
available only to existing binaries, not to new invocations of ld.)

zw