[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Asynchronous DNS
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Asynchronous DNS |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 11:43:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
> It would be better if the application code didn't have to care, but that
> means that either all those functions will have to block (getting us
> back to square one, basically), or they'll have to set up a queue of
> pending actions to be taken, which I think is rather too ambitious.
There's still the benefit of blocking in the Emacs event loop instead of
a system call, with the former Emacs can still run other process
filters.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, (continued)
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/15
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Andreas Schwab, 2016/02/12
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/12
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/09
- Re: Asynchronous DNS,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Andreas Schwab, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Andreas Schwab, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/08
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/09
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/09
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Alain Schneble, 2016/02/07
- Re: Asynchronous DNS, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/07