[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map. |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:37:06 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 08:54:42 -0500
>
> > That led me to believe the C-x h bindings had been removed. It would
> > appear there's a difference between how the C-x w bindings are set and
> > how the M-s h bindings are set.
>
> Yes. AFAIK the C-x w bindings are "legacy" bindings kept for "user
> compatibility", and we just tried to preserve their earlier behavior
> for now (until we remove them in some future version).
>
> The new M-s h bindings OTOH behave slightly differently because we took
> the opportunity to try and improve the behavior.
Shouldn't this piece of info be in NEWS? If so, could you please add
it?
Thanks.
- Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., Alan Mackenzie, 2016/02/05
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/05
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/08
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., John Wiegley, 2016/02/08
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map.,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/12
- Re: Disappearance of hi-lock bindings from global key map., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/13