Re: Next release from master

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Óscar Fuentes <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm not proposing a change on how Emacs is developed, I'm opposing the
> proposed changed that consists on using `master' for changes that are
> multi-commit, potentially destabilizing, and intrusive. That is, changes
> that have a serious potential for annoying the community while being
> hard to revert at the same time.

I don't think anybody is suggesting that.  :-) I think this all started
with "how come we're changing the way we're supposed to develop?"  I.e.,
having three "must have" branches that we're supposed to be working on
instead of two, as we've had for all these years.

(And in addition, there are always feature branches for big, complex,
breaky stuff.  See xwidget, ffi, async-dns, etc.)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no