Re: Asynchronous DNS

[Alain Schneble]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> We could fix that, of course -- there's really no reason for that
>> function to be checking infd/outfd, I think?
>
> None of the other set-process-* functions have that check so it surely
> looks wrong.

It looks like it's not required in the version on master.  But just
removing the check in the version on the feature/async-dns branch
without accounting for it in any other way seems wrong for the reason
mentioned in my other note before.  Or am I misunderstanding it?