[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Human-readable file sorting
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Human-readable file sorting |
|
Date: |
Sun, 21 Feb 2016 13:20:48 +1100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Pierpaolo Bernardi <address@hidden> writes:
> The established name is "natural sort". There's no reason to invent a
> new one?
Calling your favourite something "natural" is a great PR trick, because
then you imply that everything that isn't your favourite something is
"unnatural". I don't think Emacs needs to get on that bandwagon.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, (continued)
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Alexis, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Alexis, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Pierpaolo Bernardi, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/21
- RE: Human-readable file sorting, Herring, Davis, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Paul Eggert, 2016/02/20
- Re: Human-readable file sorting,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/21
- Re: Human-readable file sorting, Stefan Monnier, 2016/02/20
Re: Human-readable file sorting, Richard Stallman, 2016/02/20