[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 6bd9d69: Fix documentation of 'global-disable
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 6bd9d69: Fix documentation of 'global-disable-point-adjustment' |
|
Date: |
Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:53:06 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:45:35 -0500
>
> To me the difference between "sets" and "binds" is that the former
> clearly means "setq" while the other can either mean "change it from
> unbound to bound" or "let-binds".
>
> So, I find "binds" to be less precise than "sets", hence my question:
> Why did you replace "sets" with "binds"?
Because that's how I tend to think about the act of giving a value to
a variable in Emacs Lisp.