[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:47:09 +0100 |
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:48:46 -0800
>>
>> It should be fairly easy to add an option to 'configure'. Something
>> like this, say:
>>
>> ./configure --disable-lib-src=ctags
>>
>> where the option argument specifies which lib-src programs to
>> build. Is that something you'd like to develop?
> Maybe we should even make that the default? Does anyone still use
> the ctags that is distributed with Emacs?
Wouldn't that argument apply to etags as well? Exuberant Ctags has an
etags mode which can be enabled by the -e option, or by invoking the
program under the name etags.
Ulrich
- Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/09
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?,
Ulrich Mueller <=
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Kaushal Modi, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Dmitry Gutov, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Ulrich Mueller, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/03/10
- Re: Cleaner way to not build the ctags that ships with emacs?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/10