|
From: | Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: | Re: Arbitrary function: find the number(s) of expected arguments |
Date: | Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:11:20 +0200 |
> From: Philipp Stephani <address@hidden> > Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 17:49:46 +0000 > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden > > I guess we'll have to disagree about that. > > You could convince me by posting a generic implementation that would figure > out the arity of g without > executing it. You could convince me by posting a formal proof that such an implementation is impossible.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |