[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pre-test windows binaries
From: |
Fabrice Popineau |
Subject: |
Re: pre-test windows binaries |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:56:31 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
> > I agree too that Windows should not be a special case. However, I'll
> > prefer uncompressed files on all platforms (except perhaps those that
> > are too constrained.)
>
> That's your prerogative. But I think that compressing the files is the
> better default.
Seems to spare about 30% of disk space on my NTFS partition:
lisp directory size: 71 827 784 bytes
actual lisp directory size on disk: 77 844 480 bytes
After uncompressing all .el.gz files :
lisp directory size: 112 124 612 bytes
actual lisp directory size on disk: 118 095 872 bytes
So there is definitely some benefit in compressing them.
Fabrice
- RE: pre-test windows binaries, (continued)
- RE: pre-test windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2016/03/20
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Fabrice Popineau, 2016/03/22
- RE: pre-test windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2016/03/22
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Fabrice Popineau, 2016/03/23
- RE: pre-test windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2016/03/23
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Fabrice Popineau, 2016/03/24
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/24
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Fabrice Popineau, 2016/03/24
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Óscar Fuentes, 2016/03/24
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Stefan Monnier, 2016/03/24
- Re: pre-test windows binaries,
Fabrice Popineau <=
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/27
- Re: pre-test windows binaries, Phillip Lord, 2016/03/27
Re: pre-test windows binaries, Alan Third, 2016/03/22