Re: expose XHASH [patch]

[Paul Eggert]

On 03/31/2016 12:29 PM, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> Attached trivial patch just exposes internally used XHASH(),
> which fully suits this usecase.

Thanks, I like the overall idea but have some quibbles about the details.

The documentation for the new function should be next to the 
documentation for sxhash.

Shouldn't we expose hashfn_eq, not XHASH? After all, (make-hash-table 
:test 'eq ...) uses hashfn_eq, not XHASH.

Should we also expose hashfn_eql, which is what make-hash-table uses by 
default? Or is that a waste of time since hashfn_eql is the default?

Not sure I like the name xhash. Maybe sxhash-eq instead? That would let 
us use the name sxhash-eql for hashfn_eql.