[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -Wall
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: -Wall |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:35:43 +0300 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:39:02 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> I still think that warnings should be enabled by default (on Linux), but
> they shouldn't be treated as errors.
I disagree. "gcc -Wall" is at times very noisy and tends to flag
perfectly valid C as suspect. The noise level sometimes makes it hard
to find real problems drowned in the sea of false alarms.
I usually compile once with -Wall after significant changes, and that
is enough to catch any real issues.
- -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/04
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/05
- Re: -Wall, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2016/04/06
- Re: -Wall, Stefan Monnier, 2016/04/06
- Re: -Wall, Paul Eggert, 2016/04/07
Re: -Wall, John Wiegley, 2016/04/04
Re: -Wall, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/05