Re: Differences between Org-Mode and Hyperbole

[Scott Randby]

On 07/02/2016 08:05 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> The issue at hand is how to develop new features so that they extend
> Emacs in a clean way that reduces the added difficulty of learning new
> features.
>
> You've explicitly said that you don't care about Emacs.  You care only
> about Org mode.  It appears that you don't want Emacs to be easier for
> users to learn.  However, that is our goal even if you don't support
> it.  We will have to disregard your views.  We don't need to win you
> over.  It appears you're not a major Emacs contributor; I don't see
> your email address in the log.

I understand that my views are not so important since I am not an Emacs 
contributor, but please don't misrepresent what I've said on this 
thread. It is completely unfair of you to say that I explicitly claimed 
that I don't care about Emacs and that I care only for Org. I said no 
such thing, and you are 100% wrong in thinking I said such a thing. Here 
is what I said:

"Yes, I care more about Org than other packages because I use Org for 
almost all of my work, it is a fantastic tool."

Caring more for Org than other packages says nothing about how I care 
for Emacs (unless Emacs is a package of itself), it says nothing about 
the level of my regard for packages other than Org except that I care 
more for Org than them, and it says nothing about how I feel about 
making Emacs easier to use.

Since I am not an Emacs developer, I will cease to make comments on this 
list.

Scott Randby