[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Redisplay hook
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Redisplay hook |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jul 2016 05:41:22 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:05:17 -0400
>
> > As a temporary measure, try calling your code from the function
> > update_end (you will have to modify the C sources for that).
>
> Thanks for the pointer. I applied the attached patch, and it works very
> nicely. Could we refine it into a proper feature and apply it to master? Or
> are there reasons against a post-display hook?
Blocking input is not enough (and is just a workaround for problems
you had, anyway). But before we discuss this seriously, I have a
feeling that such a hook was already discussed in the past, and we
found it unnecessary and/or dangerous. Stefan, do you remember
something like that?
Thanks.
- Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/02
- Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/02
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/03
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/03
- Re: Redisplay hook,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Robert Weiner, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/04
- Re: Redisplay hook, Robert Weiner, 2016/07/04