[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Jul 2016 17:32:59 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.95 (darwin) |
>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> Here are some thoughts about the near future of gnutls.el and friends (none
> urgently needed for the release):
Ted, can you, or someone with more experience in this area, help me to
understand these alternatives? If we are all generally agreed on one over the
others, I'm willing to go with the wisdom of consensus.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/05
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/06
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, John Wiegley, 2016/07/06
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Robert Pluim, 2016/07/07
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/12
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, John Wiegley, 2016/07/12
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/13
- Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Ted Zlatanov, 2016/07/13
Re: GnuTLS/TLS proposals for after the release, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2016/07/20