[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on functio
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:30:02 +0300 |
> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 23:33:29 +0200
>
> Hmm, now I changed simple.el like this:
>
> *** /tmp/ediff230416Vp 2016-07-05 23:29:32.557789593 +0200
> --- /home/micha/software/emacs/lisp/simple.el 2016-07-05 23:27:12.017360250
> +0200
> ***************
> *** 6341,6346 ****
> --- 6341,6347 ----
> (point) 'invisible)))
> (backward-char 1)))
> (point)))))
> + (message "%s" newpos)
> (goto-char newpos)
> (if (and (> (point) newpos)
> (eq (preceding-char) ?\n))
>
> and recompiled it. After that, the issue is not reproducible anymore at
> all; neither with the uncompiled nor with compiled "simple" library.
Did the experiments with the compiled simple.elc load it into a
running session, or did you re-dump Emacs after byte-compiling
simple.el?
> Seems we won't find out anything useful by debugging on the Lisp level.
What other practical alternatives are there?
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/01
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/01
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/07/05
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/07/05
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Michael Heerdegen, 2016/07/06
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/06
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Yasushi SHOJI, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Yasushi SHOJI, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/10
- Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/10