|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: bug#9300: 24.0.50; `bounds-of-thing-at-point' does not return nil when just after THING |
Date: | Thu, 7 Jul 2016 00:51:23 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0 |
On 07/07/2016 12:21 AM, John Wiegley wrote:
The first thing I'd like to ask is whether the suffix "-at-point" means the same thing everywhere it appears. If `bounds-of-thing-at-point' is the only place where it differs, it's worth thinking about.
completion-at-point is the same as thing-at-point in this regard, currently.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |