[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook
|
From: |
Clément Pit--Claudel |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:55:28 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
Hi Mark,
On 2016-07-06 23:30, Mark Oteiza wrote:
> Applied with some wording changes as 5811404
Can you clarify why a hook is better than a function? Also, what's the expected
transition path? Will all major modes that use eldoc-documentation-function
need to be updated at some point?
Clément.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, (continued)
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/17
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/17
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/18
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/18
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/19
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Clément Pit--Claudel, 2016/07/19
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, John Wiegley, 2016/07/20
- Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook, Mark Oteiza, 2016/07/20
Re: [PATCH v3] RFC: eldoc-documentation-functions hook,
Clément Pit--Claudel <=