[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) |
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:52:04 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 21:11:32 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> > The del_range_byte call which I caught with gdb last night was, I think,
> > the one at fileio.c L4037. I don't know the code well enough to say
> > that that's the only one which might trigger.
>
> If changing that one alone solves the problem, we don't need to
> consider any others.
Actually, I think we need to change all 3 of those calls, since they
all handle the same situation, with minor differences.
- Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Noam Postavsky, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Stefan Monnier, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Alan Mackenzie, 2016/07/31
- Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2), Eli Zaretskii, 2016/07/31