[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: A few thoughts on seq.el |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:08:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden> writes:
> list L has, say, 100000 elements,
>
> (cl-subseq l 1 3)
>
> will be very slow because it always calculates the length of the first
> argument L.
Eh, no, that must have been another function, or it has been fixed.
What I said is not correct, the function calculates the list length only
when necessary (negative indexes).
Michael.