Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:12:46 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <address@hidden>
> 
> I'm not sure how to deal with this situation.  Personally, I'd prefer to
> report the real, internal 'minibuffer' parameter but am afraid that
> might break existing code.

You mean, you think there's some code out there that expects to
receive nil in that case?  Do we have any code in our tree that might
expect that?

> In any case, the documentation should be fixed.  Somehow.

Before fixing the docs we should decide what the code should do.

Thanks.