Re: Allow for result arg in seq-doseq ?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> IIRC the first version was like that, but for a forgotten reason, Stefan
>> (in the Cc) thought that the RESULT arg was useless (I myself never use
>> it in `dolist').
>> 
>> I am not opposed to adding it back though.
> To be honest i don't use RESULT on dolist either :-)

FWIW, I'd favor for seq-doseq to return nil, to really discourage the
use of its output (which tends to hide the use and its corresponding
side-effects).


        Stefan