Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:04 -0400
> 
> >> Somebody wanting to use b-c-f and reading that text is likely to conclude
> >> that b-c-f is called for _every_ change, just as I did ~10 years ago.
> > Then they will be wrong, because the text doesn't say so.
> 
> I think we're talking about different notions of "every change".

Exactly.