Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2)

[Stefan Monnier]

> So, on a-c-f revert the change, do what we are currently doing on b-c-f,
> then reapply the change and run what we are currently running on a-c-f.

Yup.

> Yes, that does seem a possibility albeit a fairly hideous one.
> It's really not something I'd want to be doing after every command.

Yes, hideous sounds about right.  OTOH if your code can work straight
from the old-text string without too much gymnastics, it's not that bad.

> I'll test out expanding the region with the code you suggested earlier.

Yes, that's probably a much better option.


        Stefan