Re: Ibuffer: w and B default to buffer at current line

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:33:27 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> > > Yes, of course.  But as I pointed out, the case at hand has
> > > nothing to do with DWIM.
> > 
> > I disagree.
> 
> And your reason is?
> 
> A user _explicitly specifies_ which to use, of the behaviors
> the command supports.  How is that guess-what-I-mean-and-do-it?

See what John wrote.  The issue at hand is broader than what you
interpreted it to be.