Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall?

[Michael Albinus]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> IIRC, it was not the case in older Emacsen and/or XEmacs.  If `functionp'
>> behaves this way since Emacs 23, Tramp could remove the check for
>> `subrp', indeed.
>
> I do remember changing `functionp` at some point, but at least in
> Emacs-21.4 (functionp (symbol-function '+)) returns non-nil.

So it was XEmacs. I'll recheck, and change it then in Tramp. Thanks for
the heads up!

>>> IOW, if there's a kind of situation that recurs often enough to warrant
>>> something like (tramp-)compat-funcall you should report this as a bug.
>> `tramp-compat-funcall' is almost used for backward compatibility.
>> Who shall be the target of a bug report then?
>
> M-x report-emacs-bug.

Package: Emacs
Version: 23.1

And the mob will jump on this, and fix :-)

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.