[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:58:07 +0300 |
> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:46:01 +0200
>
> >> There is no need for dired-mark-or-unmark-extension,
> >> dired-mark-extension should to that already. Since the prefix argument
> >> has always been useless it is ok to change its meaning, and make it
> >> consistent with all other dired commands.
> >
> > I disagree and object to such a change.
>
> But is the only way that makes sense. You objection has no grounds.
I stated my grounds. They might not make sense to you, but they do to
me.
- Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Andreas Schwab, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/24
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/25
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, John Wiegley, 2016/09/26
- Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys, Tino Calancha, 2016/09/26