Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Alain Schneble]

address@hidden (Phillip Lord) writes:

> a)
>
> EMACS/lisp/blah.el
> EMACS/packages/foo/foo.el
        ^^^^^^^^
What about elpa instead of packages?  It's 4 chars as 'lisp'.

> which is nice because it cleanly separates out the two layouts.
>
> b)
>
> EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el
                  ^^^^^^^^
elpa would suffice, I think.  Or is there a reason for the nested
packages directory?

> EMACS/lisp/unified/blah.el
>
> which also seperates the two layouts, but would require lots of file
> moves form the current system.
>
> Or c)
>
> EMACS/lisp/blah.el
> EMACS/lisp/elpa/packages/foo/foo.el
                  ^^^^^^^^
Same here.

Regards,
Alain