[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:53:35 +0300 |
> From: Noam Postavsky <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:17:30 -0400
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, Drew Adams <address@hidden>,
> Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Karl Fogel <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > I can't (re)close the bug, because it was closed earlier as "wontfix" and
> > it now says "Bug is archived. No further changes may be made."
>
> It looks like the "wontfix" tag wasn't actually applied. You can send
> a message to <address@hidden> with contents
>
> unarchive 286
> tag 286 fixed
> quit
>
> To mark it as "fixed". See https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html
> for more options/details.
I frequently wish for debbugs to be more helpful and not require such
subtle techniques. It looks like it always takes the dumbest possible
interpretation of my commands, when there's a slight problem with it.
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/02
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Noam Postavsky, 2016/10/02
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Davis Herring, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04