[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'.
From: |
Karl Fogel |
Subject: |
Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2016 14:21:54 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Noam Postavsky <address@hidden> writes:
>> I can't (re)close the bug, because it was closed earlier as
>> "wontfix" and it now says "Bug is archived. No further changes may
>> be made."
>
>It looks like the "wontfix" tag wasn't actually applied. You can send
>a message to <address@hidden> with contents
>
>unarchive 286
>tag 286 fixed
>quit
>
>To mark it as "fixed". See https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-control.html
>for more options/details.
Thank you. I did exactly as you suggested, by rote. (The debbugs email
interface is not something I plan to devote much mental real estate too, but if
you've given me the exact commands, I'd feel churlish not to send them :-) .)
It seems to have worked: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=286
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/02
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Noam Postavsky, 2016/10/02
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/03
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Eli Zaretskii, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Davis Herring, 2016/10/04
- Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'., Karl Fogel, 2016/10/04