[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Nicolas Petton |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2016 23:40:02 +0200 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
Hi Richard,
> Namespace systems do not fit well into Lisp. Common Lisp's is a total
> mess. It is better to use name prefixes.
Have you had a look at Clojure namespaces?
http://clojure.org/reference/namespaces
Cheers,
Nico
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future,
Nicolas Petton <=
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Elias Mårtenson, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/11
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Tom Tromey, 2016/10/13
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/16
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Georges Ko, 2016/10/10