Re: Emacs Lisp's future

[Marcin Borkowski]

On 2016-10-11, at 15:33, Clément Pit--Claudel <address@hidden> wrote:

>>> Bottom line: I don't see much use for proper namespaces :)
>> 
>> That's only true to some extent.  Both names and nameless packages (even
>> though I really appreciate them) are really prosthetics; I'd have to
>> check it, but how do they behave with tools like xref-find-definitions,
>> edebug, lispy and others?  I'm pretty sure that names won't cooperate
>> with them nicely (I vaguely remember trying, though I'm not sure), I'd
>> have to check nameless.
>
> I never used names.  Nameless works entirely fine with all of the tools you 
> mentioned, because it only touches font-locking.

Cool to hear that.  I guess I'll have to start using it.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski