Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/integrated-elpa 4f6df43 15/23: README added

[Phillip Lord]

John Wiegley <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "AS" == Alain Schneble <address@hidden> writes:
>
> AS> /usr/local/share/info/org.info.gz
> AS> /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/etc/ORG-NEWS
> AS> /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/etc/org/README
> AS> /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/etc/org/.*\.xml
> AS> /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/etc/refcards/orgcard.tex
> AS> /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/lisp/org/.*\.(el\.gz|elc)
>
> AS> Unless I'm misundarstanding you, using your approach, all files will end
> AS> up in /usr/local/share/emacs/26.0.50/lisp/org (using the example
> AS> configuration I gave above).
>
> AS> Do you really want to give up this standard file structure?
>
> I think we should *not* give up the standard file structure. At least not now.
> Using ELPA should feel "first class" for those authors contributing packages
> that are to become part of the standard distribution.

It can cut both ways, of course. It may well be that packages not in
ELPA feel second class, because they are not "real" packages.

I think the next step is to canvas opinion from other people. I know for
myself as a package developer which I would prefer, but that's me. As
we're discussing org a lot here, probably that would be a good place to
start.

Phil